Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SAKURA THERESA

IMO: 1026776
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 10,293 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.54 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Christiania Ship Management · part of Christiania

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,293 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

56.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+15%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

909 t

CO₂ emitted

2,854 t

2,898 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,970 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,371 h

57 days, 16% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 56.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−29%)

52.8Ranks 200 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 68% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+15%)

7.93Ranks 839 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU0%
Into the EU76%
At berth in the EU6%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,741 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Christiania Ship Management	909	2,854	15,970	1,371	11.6	56.9	17.36	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Christiania Ship Management	17.36	15.04	+15%	839 of 1,460	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.