Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MOBY VINCENT

IMO: 7360605
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EEXI 41.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MOBY SPA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

127.5 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 153.0 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

662

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

35.26

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−85%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,606 t

CO₂ emitted

8,185 t

Distance sailed

20,433 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,435 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2023

Set against all 386 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 127.5 kg/nm · median 153.0 (−17%)

77.3Ranks 126 of 386, lowest first233.8

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 16.0 (−11%)

12.0Faster than 31% of ro-pax ships22.2

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 661.54 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 680.04 (−3%)

75.81Ranks 190 of 386, lowest first1,703.94

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 35.26 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233.94 (−85%)

66.06Ranks 17 of 386, lowest first1,064.13

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU17%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

16.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MOBY VINCENT
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

MOBY VINCENT
Ro-pax median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MOBY VINCENT
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MOBY VINCENT
Ro-pax median

0.010,00020,00030,00040,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	+45%	+97%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+1%	−1%	−11%	−34%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	+3%	−99%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+26%	+22%	−4%	+5,721%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−4%	−7%	−43%	−30%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	MOBY SPA	201	638	1,101	83	13.3	182.8	–	–
2023	not published	2,606	8,185	20,433	1,435	14.2	127.5	–	–
2022	not published	1,833	5,773	14,065	1,001	14.1	130.3	–	–
2021	not published	2,026	6,378	15,762	1,097	14.4	128.6	–	–
2020	not published	2,080	6,544	15,366	1,031	14.9	135.4	–	–
2019	not published	1,717	5,403	15,961	1,042	15.3	107.5	–	–
2018	not published	3,118	9,800	27,849	1,751	15.9	112.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	MOBY SPA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2023	not published	661.54	680.04	−3%	190 of 386	35.26	233.94	−85%	RINA	A
2022	not published	336.02	626.32	−46%	132 of 394	27.18	252.90	−89%	RINA	A
2021	not published	505.52	815.19	−38%	152 of 377	59.80	226.00	−74%	RINA	A
2020	not published	37,371.82	750.91	+4,877%	387 of 387	4,641.05	217.49	+2,034%	RINA	A
2019	not published	642.01	569.03	+13%	219 of 394	78.10	222.56	−65%	RINA	A
2018	not published	923.19	728.92	+27%	212 of 361	90.46	184.05	−51%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.