Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MOBY CORSE

IMO: 7615414
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Livorno
Technical efficiency: EEXI 34.73 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MOBY SPA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

138.2 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 153.0 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

842

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

10.30

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−96%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,762 t

CO₂ emitted

11,890 t

Distance sailed

27,219 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,083 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2023

Set against all 386 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 138.2 kg/nm · median 153.0 (−10%)

77.3Ranks 143 of 386, lowest first233.8

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 16.0 (−18%)

12.0Faster than 20% of ro-pax ships22.2

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 841.79 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 680.04 (+24%)

75.81Ranks 229 of 386, lowest first1,703.94

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 10.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233.94 (−96%)

66.06Ranks 13 of 386, lowest first1,064.13

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU22%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

21.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MOBY CORSE
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

MOBY CORSE
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MOBY CORSE
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MOBY CORSE
Ro-pax median

2505007501,0001,2501,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−5%	+3%	+38%	−1%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	+2%	−18%	−58%	−23%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−25%	−18%	+279%	+117%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+40%	+43%	−53%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 40%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+10%	+7%	−47%	−65%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	MOBY SPA	4,101	12,925	30,210	2,098	14.4	135.8	–	–
2023	not published	3,762	11,890	27,219	2,083	13.1	138.2	–	–
2022	not published	2,870	9,072	19,682	1,634	12.0	145.8	–	–
2021	not published	6,721	21,075	47,066	3,133	15.0	142.8	–	–
2020	not published	2,376	7,503	12,419	904	13.7	191.3	–	–
2019	not published	3,579	11,205	26,176	1,953	13.4	136.7	–	–
2018	not published	6,103	19,092	49,239	3,568	13.8	124.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	MOBY SPA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2023	not published	841.79	680.04	+24%	229 of 386	10.30	233.94	−96%	RINA	A
2022	not published	852.90	626.32	+36%	240 of 394	468.41	252.90	+85%	RINA	A
2021	not published	1,110.23	815.19	+36%	252 of 377	95.32	226.00	−58%	RINA	A
2020	not published	512.29	750.91	−32%	154 of 387	13.94	217.49	−94%	RINA	A
2019	not published	453.37	569.03	−20%	172 of 394	12.65	222.56	−94%	RINA	A
2018	not published	1,292.73	728.92	+77%	255 of 361	67.72	184.05	−63%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.