Navalyze

Navalyze · Cruise · Ship

ARTANIA

IMO
8201480
Type
Passenger ship (Cruise Passenger ship)
Flag (estimated)
Bahamas
Port of registry
Nassau

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ARTANIA GMBH

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
201
Passenger median 266 kg/nm (−25%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
629
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 577 (+9%)
Average speed
11.6 kn
Passenger median 11.7 kn (−1%)
Fuel per day at sea
56.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,775 t
CO₂ emitted
37,131 t
Distance sailed
58,590 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,045 h
210 days, 58% of the year

Within the cruise fleet, 2025

Set against all 202 cruise ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 183 kg/nm · median 264 (−31%)
89.6Ranks 51 of 202, lowest first416
Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.1 (+3%)
10.8Faster than 57% of cruise ships15.5
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 601 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 521 (+15%)
303Ranks 114 of 202, lowest first1,701
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Cruise medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports80%
  • From the EU3%
  • Into the EU10%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,287 t
6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Cruise median is the middle ship of all cruise ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ARTANIA
  • Cruise median

Average speed, kn

  • ARTANIA
  • Cruise median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ARTANIA
  • Cruise median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.1 kn−6%−7%−4%−11%Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.8 kn+3%−4%−34%+9%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+2.3 kn−7%+11%−8%−25%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.7 kn+4%+10%+79%+1%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.2 kn+23%+21%+135%−80%Same speed, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−1.3 kn−23%−30%−72%+549%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+1.3 kn+2%+13%−3%+2%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025ARTANIA GMBH7,07322,65038,6772,86613.5183––
2024ARTANIA GMBH7,81425,05340,0872,95613.6195––
2023not published11,53236,97160,8544,21214.4190––
2022not published13,42143,02865,9055,46112.1204––
2021not published7,18323,02736,7313,23111.4196––
2020not published2,4837,96015,6131,34911.6159––
2019not published11,66036,99756,7074,40412.9206––
2018not published11,77537,13158,5905,04511.6201––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmCruise medianvs CruiseRankVerifierMethods
2025ARTANIA GMBH601521+15%114 of 202DNVB+C
2024ARTANIA GMBH674618+9%109 of 202DNVB+C
2023not published619625−1%100 of 202DNVB+C
2022not published826831−1%93 of 187DNVB+C
2021not published8171,315−38%18 of 100DNVB+C
2020not published4,1731,169+257%72 of 100DNVB+C
2019not published643589+9%98 of 177DNVB+C
2018not published629577+9%87 of 153DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Cruise ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's cruise ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.