Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

ICE RANGER

IMO: 8311132
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,497 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,497 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

81.2 kg/nm

Reefer median 82.8 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

56.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 59.07 (−4%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Reefer median 15.6 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,498 t

CO₂ emitted

10,950 t

Distance sailed

43,096 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,308 h

138 days, 38% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2020

Set against all 149 reefer ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 81.2 kg/nm · median 82.8 (−2%)

50.0Ranks 71 of 149, lowest first114.3

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 15.6 (−17%)

10.9Faster than 26% of reefer ships17.2

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 59.07 (−4%)

39.21Ranks 68 of 149, lowest first98.45

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU39%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ICE RANGER
Reefer median

80.082.084.086.088.0

’182018’202020

Average speed, kn

ICE RANGER
Reefer median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ICE RANGER
Reefer median

50.055.060.065.070.075.0

’182018’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2020	+6.4 kn	−3%	+92%	+149%	+5%	6.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	3,498	10,950	43,096	3,308	13.0	81.2	56.50	–
2018	not published	1,446	4,512	17,301	2,639	6.6	83.6	53.94	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	56.50	59.07	−4%	68 of 149	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2018	not published	53.94	72.84	−26%	36 of 136	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.