Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

MARELLA DREAM

IMO
8407735
Type
Passenger ship
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEDI 21.85 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
225.0 kg/nm
Passenger median 339.3 kg/nm (−34%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
749
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 1,169 (−36%)
Average speed
13.8 kn
Passenger median 11.0 kn (+25%)
Fuel per day at sea
74.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,110 t
CO₂ emitted
3,543 t
Distance sailed
4,935 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
356 h
15 days, 4% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2020

Set against all 100 passenger ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 225.0 kg/nm · median 339.3 (−34%)
116.9Ranks 35 of 100, lowest first807.9
Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 11.0 (+25%)
5.2Faster than 70% of passenger ships16.8
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 749.30 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 1,168.55 (−36%)
333.98Ranks 38 of 100, lowest first74,156.58
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports88%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU12%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
12.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MARELLA DREAM
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • MARELLA DREAM
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • MARELLA DREAM
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020+1.1 kn−28%−21%−91%+19%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−3.2 kn+10%−12%−17%+9%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published1,1103,5434,93535613.8225.0––
2019not published17,60155,02456,7054,46412.7310.4––
2018not published19,27160,25568,0754,29015.9283.1––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published749.301,168.55−36%38 of 100ABSB
2019not published628.35589.20+7%94 of 177ABSB
2018not published577.11577.11+0%77 of 153ABSB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MARELLA DREAM (IMO 8407735): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2020 | Navalyze