Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

RAUTARUUKKI

IMO
8418174
Type
Other ship types
Average cargo carried
8,391 t
Flag (estimated)
Finland
Port of registry
Helsinki
Ice class
IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESL Shipping Oy

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
83.2
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
8.3 kn
Fuel per day at sea
16.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,387 t
CO₂ emitted
7,531 t
Distance sailed
28,702 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,448 h
144 days, 39% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.3 kg/nm · median 87.2 (−2%)
47.6Ranks 78 of 159, lowest first161
Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 10.4 (−20%)
5.8Faster than 18% of other ships13.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.7 (−63%)
30.8Ranks 19 of 159, lowest first600
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports76%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU24%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,827 t
24.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • RAUTARUUKKI
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • RAUTARUUKKI
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • RAUTARUUKKI
  • Other median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.8 kn−26%−18%+50%–0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.3 kn+33%+13%−38%–1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.9 kn−18%+4%+21%–1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.4 kn+27%+6%−19%–1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.0 kn−10%−10%+196%–Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.3 kn+4%+1%−64%−4%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.4 kn−2%−6%−24%+12%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025ESL Shipping Oy2,2487,18226,3443,1938.385.332.5–
2024ESL Shipping Oy2,0296,40917,5622,3487.5116––
2023not published2,4577,75728,2103,2208.887.1––
2022not published2,4587,75823,2633,3506.9106––
2021not published2,3877,53128,7023,4488.383.2––
2020not published9002,8409,7081,1678.392.736.1–
2019not published2,3897,53626,8063,1088.689.137.5–
2018not published3,19610,07835,3253,9189.090.533.4–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2025ESL Shipping Oy32.586.7−63%19 of 159DNVB+C
2024ESL Shipping Oy––––DNVB
2023not published––––DNVB
2022not published––––DNVB
2021not published––––DNVB
2020not published36.1121−70%19 of 81Lloyd's RegisterB
2019not published37.590.1−58%26 of 96VerifaviaB
2018not published33.472.9−54%27 of 87VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.