Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

ASTOR

IMO
8506373
Type
Passenger ship
Technical efficiency
EIV 115.28 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
145.0 kg/nm
Passenger median 277.0 kg/nm (−48%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,165
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (+98%)
Average speed
12.5 kn
Passenger median 12.9 kn (−3%)
Fuel per day at sea
43.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
7,141 t
CO₂ emitted
22,875 t
Distance sailed
49,245 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,924 h
164 days, 45% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2019

Set against all 177 passenger ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 145.0 kg/nm · median 277.0 (−48%)
94.8Ranks 31 of 177, lowest first440.1
Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 12.9 (−3%)
8.6Faster than 45% of passenger ships16.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,165.06 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 589.20 (+98%)
353.03Ranks 143 of 177, lowest first1,627.50
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports72%
  • From the EU11%
  • Into the EU4%
  • At berth in the EU13%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
12.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ASTOR
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • ASTOR
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ASTOR
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019−0.6 kn+7%+2%+18%+14%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published7,14122,87549,2453,92412.5145.0––
2018not published5,69618,15841,8493,20113.1136.1––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published1,165.06589.20+98%143 of 177ICS Verification ServicesA
2018not published1,025.31577.11+78%119 of 153ICS Verification ServicesA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ASTOR (IMO 8506373): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze