Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DAYTONA-H

IMO: 8520836
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,505 t
Flag (estimated): Comoros
Port of registry: Moroni
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SATA CHARTERING AND SHIPPING CO.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,629 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

42.3

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+104%)

Average speed

7.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

184 t

CO₂ emitted

588 t

Distance sailed

4,335 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

546 h

23 days, 6% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 58.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−30%)

61.0Ranks 256 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 8.1 kn · median 10.7 (−24%)

8.8Faster than 6% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+214%)

4.80Ranks 3,441 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

40 t

6.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DAYTONA-H
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DAYTONA-H
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DAYTONA-H
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	+55%	+117%	−66%	+80%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 55%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−27.2 kn	−5%	−83%	+164%	−10%	27.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+25.1 kn	−7%	+286%	−29%	−13%	25.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−17%	−21%	−16%	−0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+2%	+6%	−38%	−16%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.3 kn	−75%	−81%	+8%	+277%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 75%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SATA CHARTERING AND SHIPPING CO.	162	519	2,787	344	8.1	58.1	24.8	–
2024	SATA CHARTERING AND SHIPPING CO.	306	981	8,170	1,414	5.8	37.5	13.8	–
2023	not published	122	392	3,098	94	33.0	39.5	15.4	–
2022	not published	184	588	4,335	546	7.9	42.3	17.8	–
2021	not published	265	850	5,184	616	8.4	51.1	17.9	–
2020	not published	417	1,337	8,326	1,036	8.0	50.1	21.3	–
2019	not published	1,571	4,975	7,689	746	10.3	204	5.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SATA CHARTERING AND SHIPPING CO.	24.8	7.90	+214%	3,441 of 3,611	Verifavia	A
2024	SATA CHARTERING AND SHIPPING CO.	13.8	8.09	+71%	2,675 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	15.4	8.27	+86%	3,112 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	17.8	8.71	+104%	3,619 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	17.9	8.57	+108%	3,241 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	21.3	8.24	+159%	3,046 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	5.66	8.38	−32%	561 of 3,360	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.