Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

NORRLAND

IMO: 8818764
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,331 t
Port of registry: Saint John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.95 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,331 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

41.7 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 109.4 kg/nm (−62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

101

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (−2%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

943 t

CO₂ emitted

3,023 t

Distance sailed

22,587 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,918 h

80 days, 22% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2020

Set against all 238 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 41.7 kg/nm · median 109.4 (−62%)

63.8Ranks 3 of 238, lowest first153.3

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 14.4 (−18%)

10.6Faster than 18% of ro-ro ships17.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 100.51 g CO₂/t·nm · median 102.77 (−2%)

54.30Ranks 114 of 238, lowest first305.32

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORRLAND
Ro-ro median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

NORRLAND
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORRLAND
Ro-ro median

70.080.090.0100110

’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+16%	+19%	−67%	+35%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+10%	+29%	+43%	–	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	943	3,023	22,587	1,918	11.8	41.7	100.51	–
2019	not published	2,485	7,966	69,051	6,004	11.5	36.0	74.45	–
2018	not published	1,584	5,077	48,444	4,956	9.8	32.7	50.85	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	100.51	102.77	−2%	114 of 238	DNV	B
2019	not published	74.45	90.89	−18%	84 of 271	DNV	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.