Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

YEOMAN BONTRUP

IMO: 8912297
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 42,878 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.23 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: WESTERN BRIDGE (SHIPPING) LIMITED

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 38,092 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

135

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+29%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,064 t

CO₂ emitted

22,075 t

Distance sailed

52,303 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,958 h

207 days, 57% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 123 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+49%)

61.0Ranks 3,322 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 41% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.97 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+14%)

4.80Ranks 2,275 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU24%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU13%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,927 t

13.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YEOMAN BONTRUP
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YEOMAN BONTRUP
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YEOMAN BONTRUP
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−10%	−8%	−12%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+3%	+1%	+10%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−6%	−4%	−9%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+5%	+1%	−2%	−2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−1%	+13%	−1%	−3%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+1%	−8%	−12%	+4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+2%	+21%	+9%	+11%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	WESTERN BRIDGE (SHIPPING) LIMITED	5,547	17,391	45,217	4,330	10.4	123	8.97	–
2024	WESTERN BRIDGE (SHIPPING) LIMITED	6,981	21,827	51,290	5,010	10.2	136	10.9	–
2023	not published	6,205	19,421	46,797	4,496	10.4	133	10.8	–
2022	not published	7,256	22,681	51,318	5,034	10.2	141	10.9	–
2021	not published	7,064	22,075	52,303	4,958	10.5	135	11.1	–
2020	not published	7,217	22,540	52,691	5,736	9.2	137	11.4	–
2019	not published	8,135	25,393	59,680	5,966	10.0	136	11.0	–
2018	not published	7,322	22,862	54,871	6,511	8.4	133	9.84	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	WESTERN BRIDGE (SHIPPING) LIMITED	8.97	7.90	+14%	2,275 of 3,611	DNV	A+C
2024	WESTERN BRIDGE (SHIPPING) LIMITED	10.9	8.09	+35%	2,320 of 3,089	DNV	A
2023	not published	10.8	8.27	+31%	2,544 of 3,548	DNV	A
2022	not published	10.9	8.71	+25%	2,726 of 3,968	DNV	A
2021	not published	11.1	8.57	+29%	2,558 of 3,466	DNV	A
2020	not published	11.4	8.24	+38%	2,473 of 3,150	DNV	A
2019	not published	11.0	8.38	+31%	2,486 of 3,360	DNV	A
2018	not published	9.84	8.50	+16%	2,169 of 3,384	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.