Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MOZU ARROW

IMO: 8918227
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.52 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

88.0 kg/nm

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+60%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

14.52

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.50 (−41%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,418 t

CO₂ emitted

7,578 t

Distance sailed

27,484 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,153 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 88.0 kg/nm · median 55.1 (+60%)

36.0Ranks 1,029 of 1,167, lowest first90.9

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 10.7 (+20%)

8.2Faster than 88% of general cargo ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 14.52 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.50 (−41%)

11.30Ranks 179 of 1,167, lowest first48.87

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU44%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MOZU ARROW
General cargo median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

MOZU ARROW
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MOZU ARROW
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−10%	−2%	−64%	−31%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+3%	−0%	+4%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	2,418	7,578	27,484	2,153	12.8	88.0	–	–
2019	not published	7,531	23,534	76,938	6,541	11.8	97.9	–	–
2018	not published	7,075	22,099	74,142	6,128	12.1	95.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	14.52	24.50	−41%	179 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.94	24.96	−16%	389 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	19.01	24.89	−24%	308 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.