Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

RCGS RESOLUTE

IMO: 9000168
Type: Passenger ship
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEDI 22.48 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

69.3 kg/nm

Passenger median 277.0 kg/nm (−75%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

3,372

g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (+472%)

Average speed

8.6 kn

Passenger median 12.9 kn (−33%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

481 t

CO₂ emitted

1,531 t

Distance sailed

6,948 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

806 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2019

Set against all 177 passenger ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 69.3 kg/nm · median 277.0 (−75%)

94.8Ranks 6 of 177, lowest first440.1

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 12.9 (−33%)

8.6Faster than 10% of passenger ships16.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 3,372.49 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 589.20 (+472%)

353.03Ranks 177 of 177, lowest first1,627.50

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU29%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RCGS RESOLUTE
Passenger median

0.0100.0200.0300.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

RCGS RESOLUTE
Passenger median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

RCGS RESOLUTE
Passenger median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−17%	−18%	−70%	+63%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	481	1,531	6,948	806	8.6	69.3	–	–
2018	not published	1,956	6,239	23,331	2,699	8.6	83.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Passenger median	vs Passenger	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	3,372.49	589.20	+472%	177 of 177	ABS	B
2018	not published	2,068.81	577.11	+258%	152 of 153	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.