Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CIUDAD DE ALCUDIA

IMO: 9010151
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: EUROFERRY EGNAZIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

177.6 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 153.0 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

143

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−79%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

230

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−2%)

Average speed

17.3 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,467 t

CO₂ emitted

54,551 t

Distance sailed

98,360 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,696 h

237 days, 65% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2023

Set against all 386 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 177.6 kg/nm · median 153.0 (+16%)

77.3Ranks 264 of 386, lowest first233.8

Average speedThis ship 17.3 kn · median 16.0 (+8%)

12.0Faster than 62% of ro-pax ships22.2

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 142.68 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 680.04 (−79%)

75.81Ranks 76 of 386, lowest first1,703.94

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 229.78 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233.94 (−2%)

66.06Ranks 186 of 386, lowest first1,064.13

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CIUDAD DE ALCUDIA
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

CIUDAD DE ALCUDIA
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CIUDAD DE ALCUDIA
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CIUDAD DE ALCUDIA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+1%	−0%	+10%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+13%	+9%	+17%	−86%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+2%	+9%	+12%	−48%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−4%	−6%	+19%	+99%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−5%	+0%	−16%	+34%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	4,430	13,832	26,259	2,815	9.3	168.7	–	–
2023	not published	17,467	54,551	98,360	5,696	17.3	177.6	–	–
2022	not published	15,745	49,223	89,208	5,128	17.4	176.5	–	–
2021	not published	11,849	36,997	75,938	4,193	18.1	156.0	–	–
2020	not published	10,331	32,302	67,841	3,977	17.1	152.3	–	–
2019	not published	9,043	28,573	57,212	3,268	17.5	158.1	–	–
2018	not published	11,342	35,761	68,243	4,107	16.6	166.2	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2023	not published	142.68	680.04	−79%	76 of 386	229.78	233.94	−2%	RINA	A
2022	not published	236.90	626.32	−62%	109 of 394	232.52	252.90	−8%	RINA	A
2021	not published	1,716.61	815.19	+111%	321 of 377	147.89	226.00	−35%	RINA	A
2020	not published	3,304.27	750.91	+340%	365 of 387	59.45	217.49	−73%	RINA	A
2019	not published	1,659.85	569.03	+192%	352 of 394	70.17	222.56	−68%	RINA	A
2018	not published	1,235.08	728.92	+69%	250 of 361	78.39	184.05	−57%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.