Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

ALBEMARLE ISLAND

IMO: 9059602
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,567 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Trireme Vessel Management NV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

97.4 kg/nm

Reefer median 82.9 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

66.52

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 56.80 (+17%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Reefer median 14.6 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,034 t

CO₂ emitted

12,587 t

12,785 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,434 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,736 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 97.4 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+17%)

55.8Ranks 88 of 109, lowest first117.7

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 14.6 (+3%)

8.2Faster than 58% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 66.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.80 (+17%)

36.74Ranks 76 of 109, lowest first140.03

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports66%
From the EU24%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU5%

22% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,739 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ALBEMARLE ISLAND
Reefer median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALBEMARLE ISLAND
Reefer median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALBEMARLE ISLAND
Reefer median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	+11%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	−6%	−15%	−19%	+2%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.3 kn	+1%	+11%	−15%	−24%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−2%	−9%	+18%	+22%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+3%	+1%	+3%	+78%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	−9%	+11%	+41%	+810%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	+15%	−2%	+126%	−96%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Trireme Vessel Management NV	4,034	12,587	41,434	2,736	15.1	97.4	66.52	–
2024	Trireme Vessel Management NV	3,620	11,294	37,440	2,558	14.6	96.7	65.79	–
2023	not published	4,807	15,011	46,474	2,881	16.1	103.4	64.20	–
2022	not published	5,601	17,470	54,912	3,721	14.8	102.0	84.65	–
2021	not published	4,835	15,098	46,447	2,938	15.8	104.1	69.67	–
2020	not published	4,527	14,152	44,902	2,783	16.1	100.8	39.05	–
2019	not published	3,531	11,004	31,821	2,422	13.1	111.0	4.29	–
2018	not published	1,355	4,266	14,064	909	15.5	96.3	105.12	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Trireme Vessel Management NV	66.52	56.80	+17%	76 of 109	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2024	Trireme Vessel Management NV	65.79	58.69	+12%	67 of 108	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2023	not published	64.20	55.59	+15%	86 of 135	Lloyd's Register	C
2022	not published	84.65	55.27	+53%	123 of 143	Lloyd's Register	C
2021	not published	69.67	54.99	+27%	122 of 158	Lloyd's Register	C
2020	not published	39.05	59.07	−34%	15 of 149	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	4.29	62.58	−93%	3 of 147	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	105.12	72.84	+44%	106 of 136	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.