Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

BARRINGTON ISLAND

IMO: 9059614
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,631 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Trireme Vessel Management NV

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,981 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

109

Reefer median 82.8 kg/nm (+31%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

68.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 59.1 (+15%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Reefer median 15.6 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,720 t

CO₂ emitted

33,467 t

Distance sailed

98,840 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,848 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+24%)

55.8Ranks 92 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 14.6 (+6%)

8.2Faster than 68% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (+0%)

36.7Ranks 55 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports41%
From the EU12%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

790 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BARRINGTON ISLAND
Reefer median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BARRINGTON ISLAND
Reefer median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BARRINGTON ISLAND
Reefer median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+17%	+29%	−4%	−30%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−12%	−18%	+10%	−15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+1%	+3%	−20%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−4%	−14%	+10%	+8%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−6%	−8%	−53%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−11%	−7%	+125%	+1,477%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+6%	+7%	+203%	−96%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Trireme Vessel Management NV	4,441	13,858	43,328	2,790	15.5	103	56.8	–
2024	Trireme Vessel Management NV	3,967	12,385	45,303	3,216	14.1	87.6	80.6	–
2023	not published	4,076	12,743	41,157	2,727	15.1	99.0	95.2	–
2022	not published	5,029	15,685	51,502	3,475	14.8	97.6	79.6	–
2021	not published	4,759	14,865	46,897	2,825	16.6	102	73.4	–
2020	not published	10,720	33,467	98,840	5,848	16.9	109	68.0	–
2019	not published	5,345	16,676	44,012	2,720	16.2	122	4.31	–
2018	not published	1,657	5,233	14,509	901	16.1	114	111	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Trireme Vessel Management NV	56.8	56.8	+0%	55 of 109	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2024	Trireme Vessel Management NV	80.6	58.7	+37%	83 of 108	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2023	not published	95.2	55.6	+71%	118 of 135	Lloyd's Register	C
2022	not published	79.6	55.3	+44%	112 of 143	Lloyd's Register	C
2021	not published	73.4	55.0	+33%	129 of 158	Lloyd's Register	C
2020	not published	68.0	59.1	+15%	91 of 149	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	4.31	62.6	−93%	4 of 147	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	111	72.8	+53%	112 of 136	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.