Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

QAMUTIK

IMO: 9081289
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

52.5 kg/nm

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.88

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (+60%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,348 t

CO₂ emitted

4,243 t

4,309 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,690 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,141 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 52.5 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−11%)

34.9Ranks 464 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 10.5 (+14%)

7.8Faster than 84% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 30.88 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (+60%)

7.51Ranks 919 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU58%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU2%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,448 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

QAMUTIK
General cargo median

50.055.060.065.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

QAMUTIK
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

QAMUTIK
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−7%	+6%	+38%	+6%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	+0%	−16%	−21%	−5%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−6%	+2%	+52%	+23%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+9%	+8%	−40%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.5 kn	−14%	+23%	+39%	−27%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.4 kn	+0%	−29%	−16%	−0%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	1,244	3,889	20,738	1,753	11.8	60.0	–	–
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	1,348	4,243	25,690	2,141	12.0	52.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,044	3,274	18,563	1,765	10.5	56.2	–	–
2022	not published	1,307	4,119	23,360	1,846	12.7	56.0	–	–
2021	not published	921	2,902	15,382	1,331	11.6	59.8	–	–
2020	not published	1,417	4,448	25,689	2,206	11.6	55.1	–	–
2019	not published	1,186	3,740	18,520	2,279	8.1	64.0	36.34	–
2018	not published	1,402	4,408	21,983	1,912	11.5	63.8	31.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	30.88	19.25	+60%	919 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	29.14	20.67	+41%	808 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	30.69	21.57	+42%	779 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	24.97	22.70	+10%	687 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	18.65	24.50	−24%	302 of 1,167	Verifavia	A+B
2019	not published	25.69	24.96	+3%	601 of 1,154	Verifavia	A+B
2018	not published	25.70	24.89	+3%	551 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.