Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MATIN BEY

IMO: 9082623
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 12,136 t
Flag (estimated): Sierra Leone
Port of registry: Freetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VENTO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MATIN SHIPPING LTD

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,914 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

67.6

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+124%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,059 t

CO₂ emitted

3,342 t

Distance sailed

15,663 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,430 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 59.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−28%)

61.0Ranks 318 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 40% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+100%)

4.80Ranks 3,243 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU45%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

77 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MATIN BEY
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MATIN BEY
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MATIN BEY
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.8 kn	+5%	−10%	+175%	−41%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.9 kn	−29%	+18%	+260%	+85%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.7 kn	+19%	−21%	−86%	−26%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+4%	+0%	−19%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−10%	+1%	+373%	+66%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+8%	−1%	−17%	−39%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−5%	−2%	−66%	+580%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MATIN SHIPPING LTD	1,272	4,071	21,257	2,042	10.4	59.8	15.8	–
2024	MATIN SHIPPING LTD	441	1,380	7,739	637	12.2	57.0	26.9	–
2023	not published	173	543	2,152	294	7.3	80.2	14.6	–
2022	not published	1,059	3,342	15,663	1,430	11.0	67.6	19.6	–
2021	not published	1,255	3,958	19,238	1,689	11.4	65.2	20.2	–
2020	not published	293	925	4,071	398	10.2	72.1	12.2	–
2019	not published	329	1,027	4,922	444	11.1	66.8	20.0	–
2018	not published	1,016	3,168	14,520	1,347	10.8	70.0	2.94	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MATIN SHIPPING LTD	15.8	7.90	+100%	3,243 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	MATIN SHIPPING LTD	26.9	8.09	+233%	3,015 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	14.6	8.27	+76%	3,051 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	19.6	8.71	+124%	3,702 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	20.2	8.57	+136%	3,313 of 3,466	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	12.2	8.24	+48%	2,592 of 3,150	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	20.0	8.38	+138%	3,195 of 3,360	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	2.94	8.50	−65%	68 of 3,384	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.