Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

BROOG

IMO: 9085651
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.12 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

282.5 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 230.7 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

542

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+5,854%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

108.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,879 t

CO₂ emitted

5,586 t

Distance sailed

6,651 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

417 h

17 days, 5% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 282.5 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+22%)

166.5Ranks 236 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 14.2 (+12%)

10.7Faster than 89% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 541.83 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+5,854%)

5.47Ranks 353 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BROOG
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

BROOG
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

BROOG
LNG carrier median

0.0200400600

’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	−16%	−1%	−68%	+5,036%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023	not published	1,879	5,586	6,651	417	15.9	282.5	–	–
2022LNG	not published	7,105	20,404	21,079	1,566	13.5	337.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	541.83	9.10	+5,854%	353 of 355	ClassNK	A+C
2022LNG	not published	10.55	10.38	+2%	195 of 379	ClassNK	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.