Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

REK R

IMO: 9085895
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,855 t
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MILOU, REK KING

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: REK.NAV MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,143 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

44.9

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+88%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

316 t

CO₂ emitted

999 t

Distance sailed

7,039 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

810 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 54.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−34%)

61.0Ranks 155 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 10.7 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 43% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+177%)

4.80Ranks 3,398 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU31%
Into the EU66%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

32 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

REK R
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

REK R
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

REK R
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.1 kn	+13%	+41%	+3%	+65%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+8%	+4%	+13%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−9%	−14%	−50%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−2%	+5%	−11%	−10%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+13%	−6%	+371%	−0%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	−9%	+14%	−64%	−17%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+119%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	REK.NAV MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	447	1,404	8,169	778	10.5	54.7	21.9	–
2024	REK.NAV MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	386	1,221	7,942	949	8.4	48.6	13.3	–
2023	not published	316	999	7,039	810	8.7	44.9	15.5	–
2022	not published	704	2,229	14,199	1,550	9.2	49.6	16.4	–
2021	not published	804	2,545	15,890	1,860	8.5	50.6	18.1	–
2020	not published	151	479	3,372	326	10.3	44.8	18.2	–
2019	not published	464	1,454	9,438	1,145	8.2	49.2	21.9	–
2018	not published	205	644	4,315	520	8.3	47.6	22.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	REK.NAV MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	21.9	7.90	+177%	3,398 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	REK.NAV MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	13.3	8.09	+64%	2,629 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2023	not published	15.5	8.27	+88%	3,115 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	16.4	8.71	+88%	3,532 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	18.1	8.57	+111%	3,244 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	18.2	8.24	+120%	2,970 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	21.9	8.38	+161%	3,232 of 3,360	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	22.7	8.50	+167%	3,235 of 3,384	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.