Navalyze · Container · Ship

NUKA ARCTICA

IMO: 9100231
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,916 t
Port of registry: Aalborg
Technical efficiency: EIV 38.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,916 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

76.5 kg/nm

Container median 172.2 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

61.14

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.58 (+248%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,823 t

CO₂ emitted

5,705 t

Distance sailed

23,832 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,048 h

85 days, 23% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.5 kg/nm · median 172.2 (−56%)

80.4Ranks 122 of 1,797, lowest first314.7

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 14.0 (−17%)

10.4Faster than 19% of container ships16.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.14 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.58 (+248%)

7.14Ranks 1,698 of 1,797, lowest first52.30

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU28%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NUKA ARCTICA
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

NUKA ARCTICA
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NUKA ARCTICA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	+0%	−17%	−67%	+14%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	1,823	5,705	23,832	2,048	11.6	76.5	61.14	–
2019	not published	5,460	17,074	71,323	5,073	14.1	76.5	53.73	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	61.14	17.58	+248%	1,698 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	53.73	18.88	+185%	1,593 of 1,788	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.