Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT INNOVATION

IMO: 9102069
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 22,865 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,187 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

122

Chemical tanker median 84.6 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.1 (+3%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,188 t

CO₂ emitted

19,451 t

Distance sailed

50,812 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,445 h

185 days, 51% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 117 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+46%)

52.8Ranks 1,367 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 72% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+7%)

7.93Ranks 791 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU49%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU15%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,863 t

14.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOLT INNOVATION
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT INNOVATION
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT INNOVATION
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−20%	−18%	−18%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+13%	+1%	−57%	+18%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	+6%	+19%	−37%	+3%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+3%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−1%	−12%	−10%	−5%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−13%	−6%	+72%	−18%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+3%	−5%	−41%	+13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	1,292	4,075	11,090	944	11.7	117	16.1	–
2024Bio blend	Stolt Tankers BV	1,965	6,068	13,557	1,174	11.5	145	20.1	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4,089	10,780	31,804	2,464	12.9	129	17.0	–
2022	not published	6,188	19,451	50,812	4,445	11.4	122	16.5	–
2021	not published	5,829	18,324	49,204	4,277	11.5	119	16.8	–
2020	not published	6,600	20,685	54,904	4,282	12.8	120	17.6	–
2019	not published	4,400	13,773	31,839	2,679	11.9	138	21.4	–
2018	not published	7,326	22,954	54,378	4,254	12.8	135	18.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	16.1	15.0	+7%	791 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024Bio blend	Stolt Tankers BV	20.1	16.7	+20%	777 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	17.0	16.2	+5%	685 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.5	16.1	+3%	731 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	16.8	16.7	+0%	682 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	17.6	16.2	+9%	740 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	21.4	17.3	+23%	853 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	18.9	17.1	+10%	744 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.