Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT INSPIRATION

IMO: 9102083
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 24,582 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,079 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

104

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+55%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,294 t

CO₂ emitted

7,224 t

Distance sailed

21,988 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,901 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 126 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+57%)

52.8Ranks 1,407 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.1 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 62% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+7%)

7.93Ranks 793 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU46%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

899 t

12.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOLT INSPIRATION
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT INSPIRATION
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT INSPIRATION
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	−46%	−0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+26%	+30%	+29%	−36%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−9%	−13%	−17%	+9%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−14%	−18%	−42%	+15%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	+282%	+36%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	−6%	−11%	−68%	−42%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	−0%	+7%	−16%	+52%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	1,911	6,017	15,223	1,325	11.5	126	16.1	–
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	3,715	11,726	28,367	2,367	12.0	131	16.1	–
2023	not published	2,294	7,224	21,988	1,901	11.6	104	25.1	–
2022	not published	3,045	9,576	26,426	2,190	12.1	115	23.0	–
2021	not published	6,182	19,466	45,888	3,642	12.6	135	19.9	–
2020	not published	1,514	4,742	12,020	943	12.7	126	14.6	–
2019	not published	5,085	15,927	37,919	2,812	13.5	134	25.1	–
2018	not published	6,049	18,969	44,971	3,597	12.5	135	16.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	16.1	15.0	+7%	793 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	16.1	16.7	−4%	609 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	25.1	16.2	+55%	938 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	23.0	16.1	+43%	1,005 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	19.9	16.7	+19%	841 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	14.6	16.2	−9%	544 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	25.1	17.3	+45%	956 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	16.5	17.1	−4%	604 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.