Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT CREATIVITY

IMO: 9102095
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 30,519 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,529 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

133

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+4%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,343 t

CO₂ emitted

23,027 t

Distance sailed

55,074 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,279 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 122 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+53%)

52.8Ranks 1,396 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 43% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−16%)

7.93Ranks 553 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU43%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,588 t

11.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOLT CREATIVITY
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT CREATIVITY
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT CREATIVITY
Chemical tanker median

12.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−2.1 kn	+3%	−13%	−89%	−42%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.8 kn	−6%	+9%	+28%	+32%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+3%	−3%	−30%	−11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−3%	−11%	+344%	+34%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−2%	+6%	−76%	−33%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−3%	−10%	−7%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	659	2,068	5,391	496	10.9	122	12.6	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5,666	16,453	47,975	3,698	13.0	118	21.8	–
2022	not published	4,722	14,852	37,386	3,350	11.2	126	16.5	–
2021	not published	6,517	20,480	53,236	4,496	11.8	122	18.6	–
2020	not published	1,521	4,754	11,994	932	12.9	127	13.8	–
2019	not published	6,608	20,742	50,972	4,288	11.9	130	20.5	–
2018	not published	7,343	23,027	55,074	4,279	12.9	133	17.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	12.6	15.0	−16%	553 of 1,460	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	21.8	16.2	+34%	851 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.5	16.1	+3%	730 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	18.6	16.7	+11%	786 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	13.8	16.2	−14%	474 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	20.5	17.3	+18%	827 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	17.8	17.1	+4%	678 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.