Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

WADI ALARAB

IMO: 9107681
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 35,519 t
Flag (estimated): Egypt
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.73 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: National Navigation Co

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,189 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

110

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+17%)

Average speed

7.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−35%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,845 t

CO₂ emitted

5,838 t

Distance sailed

16,741 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,327 h

97 days, 27% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+15%)

61.0Ranks 2,672 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 30% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+8%)

4.80Ranks 2,098 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU45%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,070 t

58% of all fuel; 42% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

189 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

WADI ALARAB
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WADI ALARAB
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WADI ALARAB
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−36%	−33%	+258%	−44%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+4.0 kn	+2%	+72%	−19%	−48%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	+31%	+5%	−56%	+188%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	+11%	−15%	+300%	+12%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	−12%	+12%	+29%	−2%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+15%	+10%	−67%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.7 kn	−15%	+30%	+737%	+31%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	National Navigation Co	2,048	6,507	21,503	2,130	10.1	95.2	8.52	–
2024	National Navigation Co	888	2,781	6,001	622	9.7	148	15.2	–
2023	not published	1,068	3,387	7,388	1,285	5.7	145	29.4	–
2022	not published	1,845	5,838	16,741	2,327	7.2	110	10.2	58%
2021	not published	416	1,306	4,190	447	9.4	99.4	9.11	58%
2020	not published	365	1,158	3,243	438	7.4	113	9.32	73%
2019	not published	950	2,980	9,688	1,257	7.7	98.0	9.27	51%
2018	not published	134	420	1,158	231	5.0	115	7.10	67%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	National Navigation Co	8.52	7.90	+8%	2,098 of 3,611	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	National Navigation Co	15.2	8.09	+88%	2,755 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	29.4	8.27	+256%	3,449 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	10.2	8.71	+17%	2,547 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	9.11	8.57	+6%	1,951 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	9.32	8.24	+13%	1,969 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	9.27	8.38	+11%	2,023 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	7.10	8.50	−16%	1,086 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.