Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AT 27

IMO: 9136539
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 11,911 t
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.09 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Neapoli Shipping Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,461 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

90.0

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+178%)

Average speed

1.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−85%)

Fuel per day at sea

3.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

684 t

CO₂ emitted

2,173 t

Distance sailed

7,599 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,665 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 60.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−26%)

61.0Ranks 350 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 10.7 (−12%)

8.8Faster than 16% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+105%)

4.80Ranks 3,261 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU38%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

64 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AT 27
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AT 27
Bulk carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AT 27
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+10%	+5%	−26%	+20%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+8.2 kn	−39%	+271%	+194%	−41%	8.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−6.0 kn	+73%	−63%	−71%	+60%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 73%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−3%	−3%	+62%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−4.4 kn	−37%	−60%	+42%	+2%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.7 kn	+25%	+62%	+75%	−10%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Neapoli Shipping Ltd	1,011	3,202	16,633	1,775	9.4	60.8	16.2	–
2024	Neapoli Shipping Ltd	1,234	3,898	22,353	2,276	9.8	55.2	13.5	–
2023	not published	684	2,173	7,599	4,665	1.6	90.0	23.0	–
2021	not published	1,374	4,351	26,463	3,486	7.6	51.9	14.3	–
2020	not published	871	2,759	16,323	2,143	7.6	53.4	13.7	–
2019	not published	973	3,045	11,512	958	12.0	84.5	13.4	–
2018	not published	445	1,392	6,596	707	9.3	67.5	14.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Neapoli Shipping Ltd	16.2	7.90	+105%	3,261 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Neapoli Shipping Ltd	13.5	8.09	+67%	2,653 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	23.0	8.27	+178%	3,364 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2021	not published	14.3	8.57	+67%	3,040 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	13.7	8.24	+66%	2,759 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	13.4	8.38	+60%	2,853 of 3,360	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	14.9	8.50	+75%	2,988 of 3,384	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.