Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MILOS

IMO: 9138446
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 11,459 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.26 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ONEXES MARITIME SERVICES

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,493 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

57.5

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (+57%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,314 t

CO₂ emitted

4,123 t

Distance sailed

22,840 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,365 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 68.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−17%)

61.0Ranks 769 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 7.9 kn · median 10.7 (−26%)

8.8Faster than 6% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+138%)

4.80Ranks 3,344 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU58%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

160 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MILOS
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MILOS
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MILOS
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.5 kn	+23%	−22%	−27%	–	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+2%	+8%	−78%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	−27%	−17%	+4,154%	+29%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	+32%	+55%	−93%	−12%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	−7%	−26%	−19%	+30%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	−4%	+18%	+426%	−54%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+12%	+2%	−85%	+75%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ONEXES MARITIME SERVICES	483	1,517	7,051	890	7.9	68.5	18.8	–
2024	ONEXES MARITIME SERVICES	537	1,696	9,620	778	12.4	55.9	–	–
2023	not published	2,389	7,522	43,561	3,738	11.7	54.9	16.1	–
2022	not published	77	243	1,024	100	10.2	75.1	12.5	–
2021	not published	809	2,566	14,204	1,630	8.7	57.0	14.2	–
2020	not published	1,088	3,446	17,642	1,618	10.9	61.6	10.9	–
2019	not published	215	673	3,353	380	8.8	64.2	23.5	–
2018	not published	1,314	4,123	22,840	2,365	9.7	57.5	13.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ONEXES MARITIME SERVICES	18.8	7.90	+138%	3,344 of 3,611	ClassNK	A
2024	ONEXES MARITIME SERVICES	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	16.1	8.27	+95%	3,140 of 3,548	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	12.5	8.71	+43%	3,087 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	14.2	8.57	+65%	3,022 of 3,466	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	10.9	8.24	+32%	2,363 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	23.5	8.38	+180%	3,252 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	13.4	8.50	+57%	2,856 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.