Navalyze · Container · Ship

VM VITA

IMO: 9141118
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,461 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 35.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: MS WEGA, WEGA, CHARO B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HPW "WEGA" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,008 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.2

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

113

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.5 kn

Fuel per day at sea

23.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,509 t

CO₂ emitted

17,385 t

Distance sailed

76,282 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,661 h

236 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 126 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 93.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+472%)

7.22Ranks 2,204 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports96%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

645 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VM VITA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VM VITA
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VM VITA
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−3%	+1%	+15%	+7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	+3%	+13%	+15%	+19%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−2%	−5%	+27%	−13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+11%	+11%	−24%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−8%	−8%	−1%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+7.9 kn	−19%	+95%	+104%	–	7.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−6.3 kn	+7%	−50%	−42%	−0%	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HPW "WEGA" GmbH & Co. KG	6,090	19,356	83,700	5,589	15.0	72.8	93.0	100%
2025	Vitamodo Scheepsbeheer BV	6,972	22,184	96,644	6,495	14.9	72.1	93.3	87%
2024	HPW "WEGA" GmbH & Co. KG	6,206	19,350	83,698	5,827	14.4	74.2	87.0	–
2023	not published	5,258	16,397	72,764	5,548	13.1	72.3	73.4	–
2022	not published	4,222	13,348	57,138	4,255	13.4	73.9	84.0	–
2021	not published	5,010	15,800	75,604	5,592	13.5	66.3	107	–
2020	not published	5,509	17,385	76,282	5,661	13.5	72.2	113	–
2019	not published	3,326	10,551	37,408	6,636	5.6	88.9	95.9	–
2018	not published	5,371	16,791	64,517	5,417	11.9	83.2	95.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HPW "WEGA" GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Vitamodo Scheepsbeheer BV	93.3	16.3	+472%	2,204 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	HPW "WEGA" GmbH & Co. KG	87.0	17.5	+396%	1,946 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	73.4	19.4	+278%	1,863 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	84.0	19.1	+339%	1,801 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	107	17.9	+500%	1,777 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2019	not published	95.9	18.9	+408%	1,775 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	95.9	20.2	+374%	1,679 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.