Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MOHAMAD M

IMO: 9141235
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 11,841 t
Flag (estimated): San Marino
Port of registry: San Marino
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.59 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BISCAYNE LIGHT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Mansour Management Gemi Acent

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,416 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

68.7

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+153%)

Average speed

8.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−25%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

432 t

CO₂ emitted

1,369 t

Distance sailed

6,286 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

772 h

32 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 35.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−57%)

61.0Ranks 22 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 10.7 (−25%)

8.8Faster than 6% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+21%)

4.80Ranks 2,448 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

20 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MOHAMAD M
Bulk carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MOHAMAD M
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MOHAMAD M
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−42%	−47%	−80%	−44%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−11%	−4%	+49%	−18%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+15%	+21%	−70%	+5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−5.9 kn	−4%	−46%	−16%	+63%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−27%	−13%	+1,579%	−3%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	+1.0 kn	+51%	+65%	−92%	+10%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 51%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	66	208	1,843	229	8.0	35.5	9.53	–
2024	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	575	1,817	9,381	1,067	8.8	61.3	17.2	–
2023	not published	432	1,369	6,286	772	8.1	68.7	20.9	–
2022	not published	1,256	3,973	20,966	2,709	7.7	59.9	20.0	–
2021	not published	1,569	4,983	25,061	1,846	13.6	62.6	12.3	–
2020	not published	128	403	1,493	131	11.4	85.9	12.7	–
2018	not published	1,090	3,432	19,178	1,845	10.4	56.8	11.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	9.53	7.90	+21%	2,448 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Mansour Management Gemi Acent	17.2	8.09	+112%	2,839 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2023	not published	20.9	8.27	+153%	3,324 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	20.0	8.71	+130%	3,726 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	12.3	8.57	+44%	2,804 of 3,466	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	12.7	8.24	+54%	2,659 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	11.6	8.50	+36%	2,599 of 3,384	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.