Navalyze · Container · Ship

CIELO DI RABAT

IMO: 9141792
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 19,354 t
Flag (estimated): Morocco
Port of registry: Tanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.09 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MAMBA POINT SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,337 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

145

Container median 186 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+205%)

Average speed

5.5 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−61%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

27 t

CO₂ emitted

85 t

Distance sailed

186 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

34 h

1 days, 0% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 134 kg/nm · median 177 (−24%)

78.8Ranks 808 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.0 kn · median 13.3 (−55%)

9.1Faster than 2% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+35%)

7.22Ranks 1,429 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU16%
Into the EU75%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7 t

7.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CIELO DI RABAT
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CIELO DI RABAT
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CIELO DI RABAT
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	+3.2 kn	−23%	+23%	+139%	−71%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.1 kn	+17%	−33%	−82%	+154%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+0.8 kn	+23%	+36%	−41%	+19%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MAMBA POINT SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	1,765	5,585	13,141	2,195	6.0	134	22.0	–
2024	MAMBA POINT SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2022	not published	50	155	444	51	8.7	112	15.9	–
2021	not published	27	85	186	34	5.5	145	54.5	–
2020	not published	129	403	1,040	108	9.6	124	21.5	–
2018	not published	178	556	1,777	203	8.8	100	18.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MAMBA POINT SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	22.0	16.3	+35%	1,429 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024	MAMBA POINT SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2022	not published	15.9	19.1	−17%	763 of 1,825	RINA	B
2021	not published	54.5	17.9	+205%	1,640 of 1,781	RINA	B
2020	not published	21.5	17.6	+22%	1,076 of 1,797	RINA	B
2018	not published	18.1	20.2	−11%	737 of 1,705	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.