Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

CE-NIRIIS

IMO
9144794
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
41,156 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.20 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 41,156 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
217.7 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 137.8 kg/nm (+58%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
16.64
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (+88%)
Average speed
3.4 kn
Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (−65%)
Fuel per day at sea
17.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,626 t
CO₂ emitted
5,115 t
Distance sailed
7,469 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,199 h
92 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,919 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 217.7 kg/nm · median 137.8 (+58%)
82.4Ranks 1,767 of 1,919, lowest first206.7
Average speedThis ship 3.4 kn · median 9.7 (−65%)
6.1Faster than 1% of oil tanker ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.83 (+88%)
4.60Ranks 1,551 of 1,919, lowest first24.95
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU29%
  • At berth in the EU21%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
21.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • CE-NIRIIS
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • CE-NIRIIS
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CE-NIRIIS
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019+0.2 kn+6%+12%−66%+2%Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published1,6265,1157,4692,1993.4217.716.64–
2018not published4,44613,91721,7036,7473.2204.916.39–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published16.648.83+88%1,551 of 1,919ABSA
2018not published16.398.86+85%1,443 of 1,779ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

CE-NIRIIS (IMO 9144794): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze