Navalyze · Other · Ship

ANNEGRET

IMO: 9147710
Type: Other ship types
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 26.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Fleetholding I UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

90.3

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+56%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

48.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (+96%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+63%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,183 t

CO₂ emitted

16,242 t

Distance sailed

57,398 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,628 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 88.1 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+22%)

42.2Ranks 129 of 189, lowest first142

Average speedThis ship 16.4 kn · median 11.1 (+48%)

8.5Faster than 96% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 177 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.6 (+243%)

21.3Ranks 155 of 189, lowest first306

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU17%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

536 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANNEGRET
Other median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANNEGRET
Other median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ANNEGRET
Other median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−7%	−14%	−34%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+2%	+8%	+87%	−10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−3%	+2%	+20%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+3%	−3%	−13%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+10%	+8%	−39%	−30%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−13%	−12%	−19%	+29%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.3 kn	+0%	+18%	+72%	−2%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SAL Fleetholding I UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	2,988	9,401	36,476	2,394	15.2	81.9	–	–
2024	SAL Fleetholding I UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,892	15,275	55,548	3,383	16.4	88.1	177	–
2023	not published	2,567	8,094	29,643	1,914	15.5	86.6	198	–
2022	not published	2,194	6,957	24,684	1,669	14.8	88.9	368	–
2021	not published	2,444	7,685	28,308	1,797	15.8	86.3	–	–
2020	not published	3,647	11,430	46,498	2,887	16.1	78.4	–	–
2019	not published	5,183	16,242	57,398	3,628	15.8	90.3	–	–
2018	not published	2,996	9,399	33,336	2,470	13.5	89.9	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SAL Fleetholding I UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2024	SAL Fleetholding I UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	177	51.6	+243%	155 of 189	EnvService	A
2023	not published	198	93.5	+111%	88 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	43.8	22.7	+93%	1,043 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	62.9	24.5	+157%	1,099 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	48.9	25.0	+96%	1,005 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	49.7	24.9	+100%	914 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.