Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

RAFINA

IMO
9159737
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
12,909 t
Flag (estimated)
Togo
Port of registry
Lome
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.75 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
CAPE SCOTT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SUNG MARINE LTD

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,243 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
64.6
Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−29%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
15.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+77%)
Average speed
11.1 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+0%)
Fuel per day at sea
17.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,056 t
CO₂ emitted
3,333 t
Distance sailed
16,352 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,479 h
62 days, 17% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−19%)
61.0Ranks 693 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 6.9 kn · median 10.7 (−36%)
8.8Faster than 3% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+106%)
4.80Ranks 3,272 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU55%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
150 t
4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • RAFINA
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • RAFINA
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • RAFINA
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−3.9 kn−3%−38%−3%+21%3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+5.7 kn−4%+102%+87%−32%5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−6.0 kn+11%−49%−43%+28%6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.5 kn+0%+4%−38%+28%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−1.1 kn+8%−1%+1%+17%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.8 kn−9%−3%+6%+1%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.1 kn+141%+167%−11%+88%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 141%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearSUNG MARINE LTD6962,19410,1681,1229.168.417.4–
2025ELVERA MARINE LTD1,1383,57817,0052,4636.966.916.3–
2024SUNG MARINE LTD1,2013,78917,4471,61510.868.813.5–
2023not published6682,1079,3431,8315.171.519.7–
2022not published1,0563,33316,3521,47911.164.615.4–
2021not published1,7085,39426,5612,49610.664.312.1–
2020not published1,5594,92526,2492,24811.759.410.3–
2019not published1,6145,03424,8002,26610.965.110.3–
2018not published7522,35227,8282,8369.827.05.45–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearSUNG MARINE LTD––––Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2025ELVERA MARINE LTD16.37.90+106%3,272 of 3,611Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2024SUNG MARINE LTD13.58.09+66%2,644 of 3,089Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2023not published19.78.27+138%3,278 of 3,548Dromon Bureau of Shipping–
2022not published15.48.71+77%3,456 of 3,968Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2021not published12.18.57+41%2,769 of 3,466Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2020not published10.38.24+25%2,237 of 3,150Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2019not published10.38.38+23%2,322 of 3,360Dromon Bureau of ShippingA
2018not published5.458.50−36%487 of 3,384Dromon Bureau of Shipping–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.