Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

CALA PINO

IMO: 9164756
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,216 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSIARMA S.P.A.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,376 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

157

Reefer median 86.2 kg/nm (+82%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

76.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 72.8 (+5%)

Average speed

20.3 kn

Reefer median 15.3 kn (+33%)

Fuel per day at sea

76.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,839 t

CO₂ emitted

61,797 t

Distance sailed

126,764 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,248 h

260 days, 71% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 104 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+26%)

55.8Ranks 94 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 14.6 (+14%)

8.2Faster than 89% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (−20%)

36.7Ranks 27 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU40%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,205 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CALA PINO
Reefer median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CALA PINO
Reefer median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CALA PINO
Reefer median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	+15%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+1%	+4%	−16%	−3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−2%	−6%	−2%	+5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−2%	−3%	+5%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	−2%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−10%	−12%	+14%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.1 kn	−23%	−34%	−29%	−27%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	10,457	32,637	100,152	5,999	16.7	104	45.2	–
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	9,290	28,964	87,359	5,168	16.9	106	46.1	–
2023	not published	10,943	34,102	103,920	6,366	16.3	105	47.6	–
2022	not published	11,387	35,491	105,586	6,228	17.0	108	45.4	–
2021	not published	11,112	34,631	100,720	5,878	17.1	110	46.7	–
2020	not published	11,080	34,536	102,350	6,037	17.0	108	51.3	–
2019	not published	10,888	33,938	89,939	5,228	17.2	121	56.0	–
2018	not published	19,839	61,797	126,764	6,248	20.3	157	76.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	45.2	56.8	−20%	27 of 109	RINA	A+B
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	46.1	58.7	−21%	28 of 108	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	47.6	55.6	−14%	41 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	45.4	55.3	−18%	44 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	46.7	55.0	−15%	47 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	51.3	59.1	−13%	49 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	56.0	62.6	−11%	57 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	76.5	72.8	+5%	79 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.