Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

CALA PULA

IMO: 9164768
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,199 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSIARMA S.P.A.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,426 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

150

Reefer median 86.2 kg/nm (+74%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

72.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 72.8 (−0%)

Average speed

20.4 kn

Reefer median 15.3 kn (+33%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,680 t

CO₂ emitted

61,308 t

Distance sailed

131,046 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,432 h

268 days, 73% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+24%)

55.8Ranks 93 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 14.6 (+7%)

8.2Faster than 70% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 44.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (−21%)

36.7Ranks 26 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU39%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

913 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CALA PULA
Reefer median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CALA PULA
Reefer median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CALA PULA
Reefer median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−3%	−11%	+20%	−8%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−1%	+3%	−17%	+6%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+1%	−5%	−2%	−1%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−2%	+1%	+4%	+2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+0%	−3%	−2%	−5%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−10%	−8%	+14%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.3 kn	−20%	−33%	−30%	−21%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	10,653	33,251	103,450	6,651	15.6	103	44.7	–
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	9,182	28,621	86,500	5,099	17.0	106	48.7	–
2023	not published	11,237	35,013	104,573	6,436	16.2	108	45.8	–
2022	not published	11,320	35,278	106,514	6,142	17.3	106	46.3	–
2021	not published	11,072	34,507	102,228	6,068	16.8	108	45.5	–
2020	not published	11,354	35,391	104,807	6,033	17.4	108	47.8	–
2019	not published	11,008	34,305	91,539	5,364	17.1	120	57.7	–
2018	not published	19,680	61,308	131,046	6,432	20.4	150	72.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	44.7	56.8	−21%	26 of 109	RINA	A+B
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	48.7	58.7	−17%	36 of 108	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	45.8	55.6	−18%	35 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	46.3	55.3	−16%	47 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	45.5	55.0	−17%	41 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	47.8	59.1	−19%	38 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	57.7	62.6	−8%	62 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	72.8	72.8	−0%	68 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.