Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

CALA PALMA

IMO: 9164770
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,799 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSIARMA S.P.A.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,565 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

158

Reefer median 86.2 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

75.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 72.8 (+3%)

Average speed

20.7 kn

Reefer median 15.3 kn (+35%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,244 t

CO₂ emitted

63,067 t

Distance sailed

128,097 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,203 h

258 days, 71% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 109 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+31%)

55.8Ranks 95 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.6 (−8%)

8.2Faster than 38% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (−24%)

36.7Ranks 22 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU36%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,028 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CALA PALMA
Reefer median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CALA PALMA
Reefer median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CALA PALMA
Reefer median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.3 kn	+0%	−19%	−12%	−7%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−1%	+0%	−1%	+8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	−1%	−6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+5%	+4%	+0%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−8%	−7%	+12%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−6%	−5%	−14%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.9 kn	−21%	−36%	−15%	−24%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	9,728	30,371	89,623	6,650	13.5	109	43.5	–
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	10,977	34,201	101,679	6,064	16.8	108	46.6	–
2023	not published	11,277	35,150	103,110	6,265	16.5	109	43.3	–
2022	not published	11,892	37,069	104,130	6,182	16.8	114	45.9	–
2021	not published	11,321	35,297	103,922	6,112	17.0	109	45.2	–
2020	not published	10,982	34,234	93,037	5,496	16.9	118	56.2	–
2019	not published	13,563	42,267	108,314	6,453	16.8	125	57.0	–
2018	not published	20,244	63,067	128,097	6,203	20.7	158	75.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	43.5	56.8	−24%	22 of 109	RINA	A+B
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	46.6	58.7	−21%	31 of 108	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	43.3	55.6	−22%	31 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	45.9	55.3	−17%	46 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	45.2	55.0	−18%	38 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	56.2	59.1	−5%	67 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	57.0	62.6	−9%	61 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	75.0	72.8	+3%	74 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.