Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

CALA PEDRA

IMO: 9164782
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,218 t
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSIARMA S.P.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,218 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

100.8 kg/nm

Reefer median 82.9 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

43.57

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 56.80 (−23%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Reefer median 14.6 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,522 t

CO₂ emitted

29,723 t

30,190 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

94,505 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,563 h

273 days, 75% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 100.8 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+22%)

55.8Ranks 90 of 109, lowest first117.7

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 14.6 (−1%)

8.2Faster than 47% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.80 (−23%)

36.74Ranks 23 of 109, lowest first140.03

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU35%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,763 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CALA PEDRA
Reefer median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CALA PEDRA
Reefer median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CALA PEDRA
Reefer median

20.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	+5%	−9%	−5%	+28%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−7%	+1%	+2%	−23%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−0%	−9%	−7%	+3%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+0%	+2%	+4%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−12%	−13%	+9%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−12%	−17%	−16%	−10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−3.1 kn	−15%	−28%	−13%	−17%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	9,522	29,723	94,505	6,563	14.4	100.8	43.57	–
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	9,566	29,808	99,790	6,016	16.6	95.9	34.09	–
2023	not published	10,040	31,285	97,840	6,341	15.4	102.6	44.23	–
2022	not published	10,846	33,801	105,245	6,240	16.9	103.1	42.99	–
2021	not published	10,381	32,343	100,997	6,076	16.6	102.8	41.19	–
2020	not published	10,878	33,898	92,825	5,546	16.7	117.2	55.93	–
2019	not published	14,792	46,098	110,505	6,255	17.7	133.9	62.01	–
2018	not published	19,860	61,867	126,384	6,064	20.8	157.1	74.82	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSIARMA S.P.A.	43.57	56.80	−23%	23 of 109	RINA	A+B
2024	COSIARMA S.P.A.	34.09	58.69	−42%	9 of 108	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	44.23	55.59	−20%	32 of 135	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2022	not published	42.99	55.27	−22%	39 of 143	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	41.19	54.99	−25%	30 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	55.93	59.07	−5%	66 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	62.01	62.58	−1%	73 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	74.82	72.84	+3%	73 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.