Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CATIVERA

IMO: 9172105
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 10,418 t
Port of registry: Panama
Former names: SELAMET

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Safe Sea Services Sarl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,418 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

51.1 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.52

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+97%)

Average speed

4.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−56%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

314 t

CO₂ emitted

993 t

1,008 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,142 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,295 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 51.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−38%)

61.0Ranks 97 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 4.7 kn · median 10.7 (−56%)

8.8Faster than 1% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.52 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+97%)

4.80Ranks 3,227 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (522 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CATIVERA
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CATIVERA
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CATIVERA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	+6%	−41%	−70%	−36%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.3 kn	−10%	−29%	−48%	+136%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+60%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+7%	+3%	−6%	+4%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−14%	−10%	−13%	−22%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	+6%	+1%	+3%	−11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	−7%	+9%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Safe Sea Services Sarl	314	993	6,142	1,295	4.7	51.1	15.52	–
2024part-year	K SHIPS DENIZCILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	510	1,606	9,809	884	11.1	51.9	–	–
2024	Safe Sea Services Sarl	998	3,150	20,785	2,437	8.5	48.0	24.19	–
2023	not published	2,137	6,755	40,182	3,719	10.8	53.2	10.25	–
2022	not published	1,308	4,137	25,041	2,324	10.8	52.2	9.69	–
2021	not published	1,290	4,089	26,520	2,364	11.2	48.6	9.32	–
2020	not published	1,731	5,498	30,652	2,847	10.8	56.5	11.88	–
2019	not published	1,578	4,978	29,692	2,612	11.4	53.2	13.29	–
2018	not published	1,826	5,727	31,960	2,876	11.1	57.1	12.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Safe Sea Services Sarl	15.52	7.89	+97%	3,227 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2024part-year	K SHIPS DENIZCILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2024	Safe Sea Services Sarl	24.19	8.09	+199%	2,993 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2023	not published	10.25	8.27	+24%	2,423 of 3,548	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	9.69	8.71	+11%	2,381 of 3,968	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	9.32	8.57	+9%	2,031 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	11.88	8.24	+44%	2,552 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	13.29	8.38	+59%	2,836 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	12.22	8.50	+44%	2,714 of 3,384	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.