Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

IEVOLI SHINE

IMO: 9172167
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,517 t
Port of registry: Naples
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.68 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MARNAVI SPA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,517 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

61.8 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

55.57

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+269%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,726 t

CO₂ emitted

5,460 t

5,545 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,938 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,763 h

115 days, 32% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 61.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−22%)

52.8Ranks 296 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 11.1 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 25% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+269%)

7.93Ranks 1,407 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports58%
From the EU14%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU10%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,562 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

IEVOLI SHINE
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

IEVOLI SHINE
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

IEVOLI SHINE
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−6%	−2%	−34%	+126%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	+5%	−11%	−19%	−54%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−4%	+6%	+14%	+7%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+6%	+7%	−6%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−3%	+1%	+1%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−14%	−12%	+5%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−6%	+1%	+21%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MARNAVI SPA	1,726	5,460	27,938	2,763	10.1	61.8	55.57	–
2024	MARNAVI SPA	2,778	8,710	42,093	4,347	9.7	66.0	24.60	–
2023	not published	3,285	10,293	52,193	4,616	11.3	62.9	53.01	–
2022	not published	3,003	9,402	45,807	4,488	10.2	65.5	49.45	–
2021	not published	3,016	9,431	48,847	4,798	10.2	61.8	51.25	–
2020	not published	3,098	9,688	48,433	5,004	9.7	64.0	54.23	–
2019	not published	3,400	10,639	45,953	4,790	9.6	74.0	60.44	–
2018	not published	2,984	9,353	37,983	4,266	8.9	78.5	63.02	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MARNAVI SPA	55.57	15.04	+269%	1,407 of 1,460	RINA	B
2024	MARNAVI SPA	24.60	16.73	+47%	887 of 1,274	RINA	B
2023	not published	53.01	16.23	+227%	1,246 of 1,314	RINA	B
2022	not published	49.45	16.06	+208%	1,336 of 1,409	RINA	B
2021	not published	51.25	16.69	+207%	1,273 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	54.23	16.16	+236%	1,263 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	60.44	17.32	+249%	1,281 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	63.02	17.14	+268%	1,242 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.