Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

FRIO MOGAMI

IMO: 9184548
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,733 t
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.44 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,733 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

63.5 kg/nm

Reefer median 80.5 kg/nm (−21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

53.11

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 55.27 (−4%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Reefer median 15.4 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

921 t

CO₂ emitted

2,874 t

Distance sailed

14,497 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,312 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2022

Set against all 143 reefer ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 63.5 kg/nm · median 80.5 (−21%)

46.6Ranks 40 of 143, lowest first118.2

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 15.4 (−29%)

11.0Faster than 10% of reefer ships17.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.27 (−4%)

35.15Ranks 65 of 143, lowest first99.20

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU42%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FRIO MOGAMI
Reefer median

60.065.070.075.080.085.0

’202020’222022

Average speed, kn

FRIO MOGAMI
Reefer median

10.012.014.016.0

’202020’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FRIO MOGAMI
Reefer median

52.054.056.058.060.0

’202020’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2020→2022	−0.2 kn	−13%	−14%	+126%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2022	not published	921	2,874	14,497	1,312	11.0	63.5	53.11	–
2020	not published	468	1,477	6,403	572	11.2	73.1	58.72	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	53.11	55.27	−4%	65 of 143	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	58.72	59.07	−1%	74 of 149	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.