Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTAINERSHIPS VI

IMO: 9188518
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,195 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.07 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "ATRIA" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,938 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.4

Container median 174 kg/nm (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+160%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

33.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,133 t

CO₂ emitted

28,511 t

Distance sailed

97,735 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,502 h

271 days, 74% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 417 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 13.3 (+8%)

9.1Faster than 67% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 55.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+237%)

7.22Ranks 2,076 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU10%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

767 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONTAINERSHIPS VI
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTAINERSHIPS VI
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTAINERSHIPS VI
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+5.1 kn	−5%	+47%	−4%	+9%	5.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.3 kn	+4%	−34%	−18%	−12%	5.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	−10%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−4%	−11%	−22%	+13%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−0%	−1%	−5%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+5%	+10%	+2%	−2%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−0%	−6%	−5%	+1%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "ATRIA" GmbH & Co. KG	4,770	14,943	52,344	3,638	14.4	91.1	55.0	100%
2024	MS "ATRIA" GmbH & Co. KG	5,229	16,396	54,722	5,871	9.3	95.5	50.2	–
2023	not published	6,120	19,153	66,681	4,561	14.6	91.8	56.9	–
2022	not published	6,935	21,670	74,029	5,057	14.6	93.7	52.5	–
2021	not published	9,254	28,891	94,488	6,043	15.6	97.9	46.5	–
2020	not published	9,728	30,365	99,296	6,281	15.8	98.0	48.1	–
2019	not published	9,133	28,511	97,735	6,502	15.0	93.4	49.1	–
2018	not published	9,575	29,886	102,355	6,386	16.0	93.5	48.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "ATRIA" GmbH & Co. KG	55.0	16.3	+237%	2,076 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS "ATRIA" GmbH & Co. KG	50.2	17.5	+187%	1,759 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	56.9	19.4	+193%	1,758 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	52.5	19.1	+175%	1,641 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	46.5	17.9	+160%	1,557 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	48.1	17.6	+174%	1,581 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	49.1	18.9	+160%	1,532 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	48.5	20.2	+140%	1,459 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.