Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship
BELLIS THERESA
- IMO
- 9192375
- Type
- Chemical tanker
- Average cargo carried
- 6,664 t
- Port of registry
- Valletta
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 8.77 g CO₂/t·nm
- Ice class
- IA
- Former names
- LAGUNA D., LAGUNA D, NQ BELLIS
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Christiania Ship Management · part of Christiania
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,664 t of cargo on average.
Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025
Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports33%
- From the EU26%
- Into the EU35%
- At berth in the EU7%
70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,969 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- BELLIS THERESA
- Chemical tanker median
Average speed, kn
- BELLIS THERESA
- Chemical tanker median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- BELLIS THERESA
- Chemical tanker median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.5 kn | −6% | −3% | −10% | +2% | 0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | +0.4 kn | +2% | +6% | +49% | −16% | 0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | −0.8 kn | +18% | +10% | −42% | +41% | 0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | −0.5 kn | −10% | −14% | +131% | −12% | 0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2020→2021 | +0.5 kn | −13% | −9% | +38% | −9% | 0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +0.8 kn | +12% | +20% | −11% | −10% | 0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2018→2019 | −2.2 kn | −5% | −21% | −24% | +64% | 2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Christiania Ship Management | 3,155 | 9,987 | 44,752 | 3,935 | 11.4 | 70.5 | 33.49 | – |
| 2024 | Navquim Ship Management | 3,727 | 11,761 | 49,480 | 4,528 | 10.9 | 75.3 | 32.89 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 2,452 | 7,715 | 33,248 | 3,165 | 10.5 | 73.8 | 39.08 | – |
| 2022 | not published | 3,623 | 11,373 | 57,751 | 5,133 | 11.3 | 62.7 | 27.76 | – |
| 2021 | not published | 1,742 | 5,484 | 24,986 | 2,125 | 11.8 | 69.7 | 31.59 | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,445 | 4,585 | 18,131 | 1,604 | 11.3 | 79.7 | 34.59 | – |
| 2019 | not published | 1,450 | 4,548 | 20,433 | 1,939 | 10.5 | 71.0 | 38.64 | – |
| 2018 | not published | 2,010 | 6,305 | 26,906 | 2,117 | 12.7 | 74.7 | 23.54 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Chemical tanker median | vs Chemical tanker | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Christiania Ship Management | 33.49 | 15.04 | +123% | 1,219 of 1,460 | DNV | B |
| 2024 | Navquim Ship Management | 32.89 | 16.73 | +97% | 1,031 of 1,274 | DNV | B |
| 2023 | not published | 39.08 | 16.23 | +141% | 1,139 of 1,314 | DNV | B |
| 2022 | not published | 27.76 | 16.06 | +73% | 1,092 of 1,409 | DNV | B |
| 2021 | not published | 31.59 | 16.69 | +89% | 1,085 of 1,343 | RINA | B |
| 2020 | not published | 34.59 | 16.16 | +114% | 1,109 of 1,312 | RINA | B |
| 2019 | not published | 38.64 | 17.32 | +123% | 1,147 of 1,321 | RINA | B |
| 2018 | not published | 23.54 | 17.14 | +37% | 908 of 1,294 | RINA | B |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.