Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT VIKING

IMO: 9196711
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,360 t
Port of registry: George Town

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,360 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

107.6 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+47%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,497 t

CO₂ emitted

11,000 t

11,172 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,493 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,299 h

137 days, 38% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 107.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+35%)

52.8Ranks 1,279 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 11.1 (−12%)

8.8Faster than 21% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+47%)

7.93Ranks 1,012 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU35%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU12%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,746 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

STOLT VIKING
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT VIKING
Chemical tanker median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT VIKING
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−1%	−12%	+83%	+16%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+9%	+13%	+141%	−13%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−12%	−14%	−73%	+18%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	−33%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+4%	−1%	−24%	+16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	+19%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	+1%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	3,497	11,000	32,493	3,299	9.8	107.6	22.04	–
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	1,929	6,057	17,791	1,599	11.1	108.4	18.96	–
2023	not published	736	2,299	7,369	692	10.6	99.8	21.68	–
2022	not published	3,104	9,775	27,366	2,511	10.9	113.4	18.41	–
2021	not published	4,310	13,556	40,552	3,691	11.0	106.3	22.22	–
2020	not published	5,496	17,254	53,578	4,685	11.4	102.6	19.15	–
2019	not published	4,673	14,643	44,924	3,947	11.4	104.0	20.08	–
2018	not published	4,833	15,133	44,298	3,894	11.4	109.1	20.18	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	22.04	15.04	+47%	1,012 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	18.96	16.73	+13%	736 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	21.68	16.23	+34%	850 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	18.41	16.06	+15%	812 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	22.22	16.69	+33%	919 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	19.15	16.16	+19%	827 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	20.08	17.32	+16%	811 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	20.18	17.14	+18%	807 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.