Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LADY SPERANZA

IMO: 9200574
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,900 t
Flag (estimated): Guinea-Bissau
Port of registry: Bissau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PENYEZ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Perama Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,737 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

52.5

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+80%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

629 t

CO₂ emitted

1,988 t

Distance sailed

11,999 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,243 h

52 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 28.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−65%)

61.0Ranks 7 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 10.7 (+41%)

8.8Faster than 100% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+135%)

4.80Ranks 3,337 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU32%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

89 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LADY SPERANZA
Bulk carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY SPERANZA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LADY SPERANZA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+4.8 kn	−41%	−13%	+51%	+9%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 41%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+14%	+6%	−17%	+26%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−19%	−11%	−4%	−14%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+0%	+4%	+26%	+2%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+20%	+22%	+2,453%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−28%	−21%	−97%	–	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	+35%	+57%	+26%	−10%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 35%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Perama Shipmanagement Ltd	522	1,651	18,162	1,202	15.1	28.7	18.6	–
2024	Perama Shipmanagement Ltd	587	1,849	12,031	1,172	10.3	48.8	17.1	–
2023	not published	619	1,954	14,497	1,313	11.0	42.7	13.6	–
2022	not published	794	2,514	15,102	1,504	10.0	52.6	15.7	–
2021	not published	629	1,988	11,999	1,243	9.7	52.5	15.4	–
2020	not published	20	65	470	49	9.6	43.6	–	–
2019	not published	1,116	3,508	18,408	2,105	8.7	60.6	15.5	–
2018	not published	655	2,054	14,560	1,951	7.5	45.0	17.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Perama Shipmanagement Ltd	18.6	7.90	+135%	3,337 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Perama Shipmanagement Ltd	17.1	8.09	+111%	2,836 of 3,089	Verum et Accuratus	A
2023	not published	13.6	8.27	+64%	2,973 of 3,548	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	15.7	8.71	+80%	3,484 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	15.4	8.57	+80%	3,123 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	15.5	8.38	+85%	3,027 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	17.2	8.50	+102%	3,100 of 3,384	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.