Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

BZ CHONGFU

IMO
9200691
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
34,000 t
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EEXI 13.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
BRUSSELS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Beteiligungs- KG MS "BRUSSEL" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 43,451 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
224
Container median 186 kg/nm (+21%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
16.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−9%)
Average speed
16.8 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (+19%)
Fuel per day at sea
90.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
15,348 t
CO₂ emitted
48,582 t
Distance sailed
68,553 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,084 h
170 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 216 kg/nm · median 177 (+22%)
78.8Ranks 1,382 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)
9.1Faster than 74% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+23%)
7.22Ranks 1,345 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU43%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
14,964 t
98% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,224 t
2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BZ CHONGFU
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • BZ CHONGFU
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BZ CHONGFU
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.3 kn−7%−9%−69%+34%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.0 kn−3%−3%+15%−5%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−1.4 kn+5%−4%−9%−3%1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.3 kn+2%+0%−13%−0%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+3.1 kn+12%+37%+15%+9%3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.2 kn+5%+6%−13%−3%Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.6 kn−5%−9%−1%−1%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearBeteiligungs- KG MS "BRUSSEL" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.3,24210,19213,03795013.724915.9–
2025Safe Ships Ltd4,17713,17419,3351,30814.821620.0–
2024Beteiligungs- KG MS "BRUSSEL" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.14,71446,17363,0954,17015.123315.0–
2023not published13,18641,39054,8163,63915.124115.7–
2022not published13,68243,30359,9263,62916.522816.297%
2021not published15,34848,58268,5534,08416.822416.398%
2020not published11,98337,94859,8194,37813.720015.0–
2019not published13,15641,15968,9205,09013.519115.4–
2018not published13,96143,56769,4154,91014.120115.6–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearBeteiligungs- KG MS "BRUSSEL" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.––––EnvServiceC
2025Safe Ships Ltd20.016.3+23%1,345 of 2,208VerifaviaA
2024Beteiligungs- KG MS "BRUSSEL" Verwaltungs- und Bereederungs GmbH & Co.15.017.5−15%815 of 1,974EnvServiceC
2023not published15.719.4−19%769 of 1,899EnvServiceC
2022not published16.219.1−15%779 of 1,825ABSC
2021not published16.317.9−9%801 of 1,781ABSC
2020not published15.017.6−15%737 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published15.418.9−18%687 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published15.620.2−23%581 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.