Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

EPSILONGAS (EPSILONGAS)

IMO: 9202039
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,548 t
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: EPSILONGAS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,548 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

44.4 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 80.4 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.82

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.82 (+53%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.5 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,057 t

CO₂ emitted

3,327 t

3,379 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,818 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,496 h

104 days, 28% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2024

Set against all 306 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 44.4 kg/nm · median 80.4 (−45%)

51.6Ranks 14 of 306, lowest first125.8

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 12.5 (−24%)

9.3Faster than 11% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 54.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.82 (+53%)

15.04Ranks 201 of 306, lowest first115.00

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU85%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,677 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EPSILONGAS (EPSILONGAS)
Gas carrier (LPG) median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

EPSILONGAS (EPSILONGAS)
Gas carrier (LPG) median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EPSILONGAS (EPSILONGAS)
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−17%	−24%	−49%	−52%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−25%	−29%	+71%	−30%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−3%	−10%	+9%	−14%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+10%	+18%	−31%	+28%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.9 kn	−4%	+71%	−1%	−21%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−5%	−20%	−15%	+21%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG	1,057	3,327	23,818	2,496	9.5	44.4	54.82	–
2023	not published	2,522	7,983	47,048	4,518	10.4	53.6	113.42	–
2022	not published	1,963	6,293	27,490	2,505	11.0	71.4	163.01	–
2021	not published	1,854	5,943	25,259	2,138	11.8	73.4	190.46	–
2020	not published	2,442	7,809	36,448	3,325	11.0	67.0	148.31	–
2019	not published	2,569	8,226	36,755	5,982	6.1	69.9	187.19	–
2018	not published	3,173	10,146	43,223	5,910	7.3	73.4	154.68	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts-AG	54.82	35.82	+53%	201 of 306	Swiss Climate	B+C
2023	not published	113.42	41.77	+172%	283 of 330	Swiss Climate	B+C
2022	not published	163.01	42.53	+283%	339 of 348	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	190.46	46.91	+306%	314 of 323	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	148.31	42.29	+251%	316 of 339	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	187.19	45.85	+308%	321 of 331	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	154.68	53.11	+191%	279 of 297	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.