Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC RACHEL F

IMO: 9212010
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,368 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RACHEL BORCHARD

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CS Charlotte Shipping Co Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,092 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

103

Container median 182 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

45.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+123%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,802 t

CO₂ emitted

30,558 t

Distance sailed

95,496 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,681 h

278 days, 76% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 101 kg/nm · median 177 (−43%)

78.8Ranks 552 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 32% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+163%)

7.22Ranks 1,934 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports81%
From the EU2%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,054 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC RACHEL F
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC RACHEL F
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC RACHEL F
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+5%	−5%	−41%	+15%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	−2%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	+6%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	−4%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	+9%	−12%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−12%	−12%	−33%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+0%	−5%	−12%	+0%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CS Charlotte Shipping Co Ltd	2,686	8,385	26,893	2,005	13.4	99.9	36.7	–
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,606	11,265	35,597	2,920	12.2	101	43.0	–
2024	CS Charlotte Shipping Co Ltd	5,871	18,312	60,753	4,535	13.4	96.6	37.5	–
2023	not published	5,873	18,522	61,991	4,535	13.7	94.7	45.2	–
2022	not published	5,673	17,891	58,524	4,297	13.6	96.9	40.4	–
2021	not published	5,768	18,190	61,120	4,437	13.8	94.4	34.1	–
2020	not published	5,075	16,004	55,993	4,169	13.4	90.6	38.5	–
2019	not published	8,631	26,920	83,916	6,224	13.5	103	45.2	–
2018	not published	9,802	30,558	95,496	6,681	14.3	103	45.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CS Charlotte Shipping Co Ltd	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	43.0	16.3	+163%	1,934 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	CS Charlotte Shipping Co Ltd	37.5	17.5	+114%	1,583 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2023	not published	45.2	19.4	+133%	1,622 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	40.4	19.1	+111%	1,487 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	34.1	17.9	+90%	1,389 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	38.5	17.6	+119%	1,457 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	45.2	18.9	+139%	1,491 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	45.1	20.2	+123%	1,413 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.