Navalyze · Container · Ship

CACHALOT

IMO: 9212022
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,380 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 36.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHARLOTTE BORCHARD

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Cachalot Corp

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,437 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Container median 182 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

54.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+169%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,950 t

CO₂ emitted

31,029 t

Distance sailed

88,681 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,141 h

256 days, 70% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 371 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 45% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+101%)

7.22Ranks 1,740 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports79%
From the EU2%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,344 t

4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CACHALOT
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CACHALOT
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CACHALOT
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−12%	−7%	−40%	−22%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	−2%	−10%	−18%	−8%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	+1%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+9%	+5%	−2%	+31%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−4%	+2%	+8%	−26%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−11%	−14%	−33%	−26%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−6%	−11%	−4%	+2%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Cachalot Corp	2,651	8,316	30,273	2,319	13.1	87.6	32.8	–
2024part-year	FAIRPLAY Container Ships B.V.	2,808	8,856	28,617	2,164	13.2	98.1	41.0	–
2024	Cachalot Corp	5,049	15,891	50,572	4,123	12.3	99.8	41.9	–
2023	not published	6,258	19,737	61,423	4,599	13.4	102	45.3	–
2022	not published	5,968	18,823	60,832	4,490	13.5	98.1	39.8	–
2021	not published	5,595	17,645	61,866	4,432	14.0	90.4	30.4	–
2020	not published	5,385	16,986	57,135	4,344	13.2	94.2	41.0	–
2019	not published	9,033	28,183	85,485	6,279	13.6	106	55.7	–
2018	not published	9,950	31,029	88,681	6,141	14.4	112	54.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Cachalot Corp	32.8	16.3	+101%	1,740 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024part-year	FAIRPLAY Container Ships B.V.	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B
2024	Cachalot Corp	41.9	17.5	+139%	1,642 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2023	not published	45.3	19.4	+133%	1,624 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	39.8	19.1	+108%	1,484 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	30.4	17.9	+70%	1,313 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	41.0	17.6	+133%	1,488 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	55.7	18.9	+195%	1,618 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	54.4	20.2	+169%	1,535 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.