Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AILEEN

IMO: 9214252
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 11,884 t
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,884 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

55.8 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−32%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+88%)

Average speed

3.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−64%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

205 t

CO₂ emitted

650 t

660 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,680 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

936 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 55.8 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−32%)

61.0Ranks 181 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 3.9 kn · median 10.7 (−64%)

8.8Faster than 0% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+88%)

4.80Ranks 3,184 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU56%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (335 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AILEEN
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AILEEN
Bulk carrier median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AILEEN
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−2.7 kn	−23%	−58%	−16%	+10%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+13%	−17%	−40%	+24%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	+24%	−7%	−26%	−15%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	−12%	+7%	+96%	−17%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−20%	−26%	−41%	−6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	205	650	3,680	936	3.9	55.8	14.86	–
2024	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	81	256	1,591	497	3.2	50.8	20.71	–
2022	not published	125	392	1,898	322	5.9	65.7	18.77	–
2021	not published	184	576	3,155	394	8.0	58.4	15.17	–
2020	not published	202	639	4,291	403	10.6	47.2	17.89	–
2019	not published	118	367	2,186	250	8.7	53.8	21.57	–
2018	not published	249	779	3,688	393	9.4	67.6	23.04	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	14.86	7.89	+88%	3,184 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	DALCO SHIPPING DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	20.71	8.27	+150%	3,314 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2022	not published	18.77	8.71	+115%	3,666 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A+B+C
2021	not published	15.17	8.57	+77%	3,102 of 3,466	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	17.89	8.24	+117%	2,970 of 3,150	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2019	not published	21.57	8.38	+157%	3,229 of 3,360	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2018	not published	23.04	8.50	+171%	3,238 of 3,384	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.