Navalyze · Container · Ship

W KAMPALA

IMO: 9215311
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,707 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK KAMPALA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kohala Shipping Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 67,404 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

202

Container median 178 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.43

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−51%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,949 t

CO₂ emitted

34,462 t

Distance sailed

54,218 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,814 h

159 days, 44% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 197 kg/nm · median 177 (+11%)

78.8Ranks 1,252 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 47% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−37%)

7.22Ranks 603 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU46%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,289 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

W KAMPALA
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

W KAMPALA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

W KAMPALA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−10%	−22%	−21%	−4%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+19%	+27%	−21%	−5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−8%	−10%	+16%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	+17%	+28%	+181%	−41%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+5.5 kn	−9%	+57%	+1,218%	+15%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−14%	−26%	−42%	−13%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	+2%	+21%	−31%	−25%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Kohala Shipping Ltd	7,641	23,916	38,889	2,957	13.2	197	10.3	–
2024	Kohala Shipping Ltd	10,835	34,024	49,461	3,282	15.1	219	10.8	–
2023	not published	11,593	36,434	62,736	4,472	14.0	185	11.4	–
2022	not published	10,949	34,462	54,218	3,814	14.2	202	9.43	–
2021	not published	3,329	10,501	19,298	1,486	13.0	173	16.0	–
2020	not published	276	865	1,464	194	7.5	189	14.0	–
2019	not published	549	1,717	2,506	286	8.8	219	16.0	100%
2018	not published	781	2,436	3,634	490	7.4	215	21.4	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kohala Shipping Ltd	10.3	16.3	−37%	603 of 2,208	DNV	A+B+C
2024	Kohala Shipping Ltd	10.8	17.5	−39%	501 of 1,974	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	11.4	19.4	−41%	480 of 1,899	DNV	A+B+C
2022	not published	9.43	19.1	−51%	279 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	16.0	17.9	−11%	780 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	14.0	17.6	−21%	663 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	16.0	18.9	−15%	722 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	21.4	20.2	+6%	912 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.